What is Proper Research? #MRX
Proper English, proper attire, proper format. Everything needs to be proper. At the recent Research Live social media research conference in London, I kept hearing a phrase that sounded something like this: “we didn’t do proper research.”
So what is proper research? Is it test and control groups? Large sample sizes? Quantitative data and probability based statistics? Surveys and randomized groups? It made me wonder what was improper about the research, why their research was so bad that it needed special caveats.
Research isn’t test-tubes and skinner boxes. Research is a living, breathing process by which people discover relationships among variables. Research comes in all forms from qual to quant, from covert to overt, from 1 group to 51 groups, from surveys to n=1 case studies, from exploratory to confirmatory.
The only form of proper research I know is this: a scientific approach to discovering answers to questions. This process involves knowing the risks, the pros and cons, the biases and skews of the method you’ve chosen. It involves knowing how to handle the resulting data properly, without preconceived biases, without expectancy effects. Proper research isn’t a specific type of research. It’s simply smart research.
Related articles
A Sampling of London Chocolate Bars
What are holidays for? Holidays are your chance to experience life from an entirely new perspective. As a market researcher, it means I get to combine a couple of things that are extremely important to me: research and chocolate.
So, in this n=1 research (I am only a sample of 1), my recent trip to speak on a panel at the Research Live social media research conference in London meant that I had an additional important task ahead of me. I took the opportunity to carefully evaluate a number of chocolate bars found in London with which I am unfamiliar. From nougat to nuts, and grastolicious to gross, I hope these ratings will help you in your future chocolate decisions.
For each of the following brands of candy bars, please indicate your overall level of satisfaction on a scale from 1 (Very Dissatisfied) to 5 (Very Satisfied).
Brand | Very Dissatisfied | Somewhat Dissatisfied | Neutral | Somewhat Satisfied | Very Satisfied |
Boost | X | ||||
Caramac | X | ||||
Cote | X | ||||
Daim | X | ||||
Double Decker | X | ||||
Flyte | X | ||||
Galaxy Caramel | X | ||||
Galaxy Chocolate | X | ||||
Galaxy Cookie | X | ||||
Galaxy Orange | X | ||||
Milka | X | ||||
Milky Bar | X | ||||
Munchies | X | ||||
My Purple Bar | X | ||||
Riesen | X | ||||
Ripple | X | ||||
Snack | X | ||||
Starbar | X | ||||
Toffee Crisp | X | ||||
Topic | Melted goo | ||||
Vanilla Fudge | X | ||||
Wispa | X |
Related articles
Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx
AFTERNOON KEYNOTE ADDRESS
16.30 Carrie Longton on what Mumsnet has taught her about the risks and rewards of engaging with people in social media
Carrie Longton co-founded Mumsnet in 2000 with Justine Roberts after the pair met in antenatal classes. The site, designed as a way for parents to share knowledge and support, quickly took on a life of its own. It now gets more than 30 million page impressions every month from more than 1.5 million unique visitors, and its influence has been felt by politicians and businesses through its high-profile campaigns and boycotts. Among Longton’s responsibilities is leading Mumsnet’s insight team, which includes running a research panel and organising product tests for manufacturers. Before starting Mumsnet she worked as a TV producer, working with the likes of Clive James and Cilla Black.
Carrie Longton, Co-Founder, Mumsnet.com
- Mumsnet – By parents, for parents. Peer to peer online advice.
- They learned that people didn’t necessarily value advice from experts, but advice from other people in their shoes – moms.
- It grew by word of mouth, mumsnetters was what users called themselves
- Now they have a panel of moms and grandparents
- Average user session is 15 minutes and they visit 11 pages. They are high income, high-educated, wide age spread, and they take holidays. They are women, not ‘just’ moms.
- Research as a way of marketing to people. [That’s a big no no for researchers but they aren’t a research company and so aren’t bound by research rules]
- What moms want? Make lives easier, save time and effort, transparent, don’t stereotype, listen to opinions. I’m not a slummy mummy or yummy mummy, i’m a real unique person.
- 90% of traffic heads to talk boards. “Am i being unreasonable” is the most popular topic and it’s not kids related. Chat is popular. Relationships is popular. Style and beauty is popular. 79% have bought a product after a recommendation from mumsnet.
- This is the power of targeted advice. Many think this site is better than google.
- Tools of engagement – Bespoke advertising. surveys, groups, tests. Bloggers network. Events. User videos. Webchats.
- Online communication – DO respect, consult early, target serial networkers, think user-generated, engage, enfranchise, empathize, endear, entertain
- DON’T think celebrity equals success, expect people to do something you wouldn’t do, try to force viral buzz, be afraid of criticism or debate
- Bernard Matthews – change your meat not your menu. Mumsnet told people it was for Bernard. They invited moms to watch him cook. Process convined people to change their minds about turkey.
- Pizza Express – want family friendly restaurant of future. Started with an unbranded survey. Worked with mumsnet to ask what did they really want from a family restaurant. Created a service charter to help the staff better understand how to serve food to kids.
- Ford – Invited whole family to test drive. Sent them to the drive in theatre. Took moms to the race track which they loved because they weren’t being stereotyped.
Related articles
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- No way? Way! The LoveStats Book! #MRX (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Ethical Framework for SMR, Panel #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- The Gap between brands and consumers by Adams and Hallums #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
The Gap between brands and consumers by Adams and Hallums #SoMeMR #li #mrx
16.00 Harnessing the power of social media, bridging the gap between brands and consumers
- How to harness the power of social media platforms for research
- Best practice for recruiting and retaining customers to an online community
- How to get the most out of your online panel community and show ROI
- The power of the panel community compared to other research methodologies
Rachel Adams, Marketing Director, Toluna
Mark Hallums, Director of Product Technology, Toluna
- [Harness the power! I’m already having fun. 🙂 ]
- “Bring back Wispa” campaign caused Cadbury to bring back a brand. [I bought one. Watch for my chocolate bar rating blog post.]
- Gap logo was changed, and then changed back due to social media chatter. Gap admitted they failed to engage the online community to redo the logo correctly.
- Dell IdeaStorm was an online commuity of 12 000 members, 84 000 comments, 900 000 votes, 1-5% of ideas were usable. Research, sales, marketing teams all used the data.
- They have a research social network which was a challenge to low response rates and recruitment challenges. Aimed to increase engagement with memers. Included profiles, polls, results, rating and following, external polls to twitter or facebook.
- Benefits to brands – brand advocacy, co-creation, pre-screen customers, engaged product testers, reduce new product development cycle
- Panel allows for DIY online surveys, up to 15 questions, launched immediately, with real-time results [Not gen pop but we know how to handle that]
- [What I’ve learned – always describe the brand you’re talking about because there will be people in your audience who don’t know what it is. i am missing ALL the jokes today. 🙂 ]
- Next – Turn facebook fans into fully profiled respondents, facebook likes don’t come with demographic profiles, use the opt-in process
Related articles
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- No way? Way! The LoveStats Book! #MRX (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Ethical Framework for SMR, Panel #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx
15.30 PANEL: Will communities kill the 6 group project?
- The future for research communities in generating insight
- How online communities fit into the overall market research mix
- Evaluating cost efficiencies and quality trade-offs
Nick Priestley, Managing Director, Tuned In
- Are communities mainstream now? We are approaching mass market in terms of awareness. People still have concerns about blurring boundaries but there are more and more success stories. Barrier is internal stake holders.
- Is it research? should we call it research? It’s more about collaboration and getting input in at the beginning. Forward thinking clients are open to it. Does it replace traditional focus group?
- is 6 group project under threat? It will never die. It is still relevant. But there are many benefits to online approach. Start with hypotheses, develop over time. You can do this in two hour. Vast geography, you can’t do focus groups in hard to reach areas.
- What kind of people work best in communities? 1% are super users, 9% are active, 90% don’t do anything. We want more people to be active. Now, people are more familiar with the idea. We need to show the process more to interest more people.
- Segment communities so you can identify the creative people and the strict people and use each group to their strengths. Find tasks that are creative as possible to encourage people. People often don’t realize they were capable of expressing themselves in that way.
- Audience – it’s important to listen to people who know nothing and these people aren’ t in communities.
- Online doesn’t necessarily mean cheaper. You get more value from community. More people, less geography issues, less time of day issues, more natural setting, technology gives you more creative options.
- Is it the shiny object effect? Do groups need a fresh spark? There is absolutely room for both. [Ah yes, the dichotomy must always be there, qual vs quant, online vs offline, MY favourite must always win. Can we just all use one big tool box with all the shiny tools in it?]
- Are communities a safe haven with fewer ethics issues? Are communities fake social media? Communities are no different from people in real life.
- Audience – Will facebook put an end to parties? Same as will communities put an end to groups. The two must work together. [ha, yeah. no more parties for me.]
- Communities when used properly will replace parts of panel and parts of focus groups. [Because it is a better tool for various objectives. Use the RIGHT tool from your toolbox.]
- Audience – Are focus groups more boring than they need to be? Can we incorporate fun of communities back into focus group.
- Audience – What about finding pre-existing communities, that aren’t created by MR. This area is littered with huge fails because of lack of transparency, researchers failing to identify themselves. Perhaps use those areas for recruitment. [remember patientslikeme]
- Audience – 6 groups aren’t under threat, the creative brainstorming groups are under threat. Communities let you do it over a longer period of time.
- Audience – Are communities at risk because anyone can do them, even if you aren’t trained? Well, the client can read the entire transcript and confirm it all.
Related articles
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- No way? Way! The LoveStats Book! #MRX (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Ethical Framework for SMR, Panel #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- The Gap between brands and consumers by Adams and Hallums #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx
14.30 Using a Community Approach to Inspire Creative Development
How communities can play a role in each stage of the creative development process
How we can overcome many of the issues with traditional creative development research
Explaining the power of iterative development
Doug Dunn, CEO, Tuned In
Debi Bester, Director of Creativity & Innovation, The Reinvention Works
- Research is the creative and the creative is the research.
- RNLI (Royal National Lifeboat Association) – Youth who had never heard of them now knew them because of mystery packages sent to influential youth bloggers. got 1 million responses/comments/videos/views. #1 most viewed in numerous countries. Reached 15% of youth in Britain. “supporters of tomorrow”
- Where did it come from?
- Strategy – generate insights; Create – inspire ideas: Crafting = generate content; Evaluate – refine and validate.
- The brief – get young people to lead the word in adopting a sustainable lifestyle by creating a longterm generational behaviour changing campaign.
- Projective technique – Imagine it’s 2050, climate change is halted, rainforests have regrown, ice caps have reformed. Now, imagine who caused this, how did it happen. Answer – Older people won’t do anything, I need to do something. We don’t need us and them campaigns.
- Role playing – How did you start your movement? How did you inspire others to join in? Researchers learned a series of small changes better than big stunts and gestures.
- Use social game theory and make the serious part fun. Make recycling fun to interactive with.
- Make it financially rewarding to participate. Like Volkswagon, fine people who speed to pay people who don’t.
- Create a measurement tool to show people how green their lifestyle is.
- Use the visual language of the generation. Maybe originality is over-rated. Familiar is effective.
- Give the participants special offers, discounts, freebies when they choose eco-friendly. Let them preview, test, and try new products.
Related articles
- No way? Way! The LoveStats Book! #MRX (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- The Gap between brands and consumers by Adams and Hallums #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Ethical Framework for SMR, Panel #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx
14.00 Mum knows best: How a community approach helped Mothercare connect with mums and mums-to-be
- How Mothercare used a community approach to extract personal and emotional insights into motherhood in 2011
- How to optimise long-term engagement to encourage respondents to share their innermost tensions and trepidations
- Building a strong sense of community with a clear purpose to get the most out of interactions
- Sharing key learnings from managing and running a community
- Using insights to understand how Mothercare can respond and cater to the changing needs of mums
Paul Child, Associate Director, Join the Dots
John Boreham, Group Insights and Planning Manager, Mothercare
- Real people telling real stories is the best part of the community approach
- Mothercare catalogue study – 150 moms, 5000 comments, 12 months
- Pramrage – like road rage, but with baby buggies 🙂
- Wanted to take people to safe place for sharing and collaboration, where mom’s can benefit as well. Moms like the closed circle, not having to give the ‘right’ answer.
- Brave and patient – Try things and see what works and doesn’t work. It was experimental development of the tool.
- Hard working – For clients to get buy-in, and moderating/responding/developing relationships/becoming friends. Don’t still stick to ask and answer, become friends.
- Bite sized – If you don’t get it right, you can always go back. Start with a question or a task and gradually get to a bigger picture.
- In your hands – It’s in your control. set the agenda, what’s important, where it goes, who you respond to. Or go with what people want to talk about.
- Techniques – community newsletter with new births and actioned results, match mom to baby photo games, share videos
- How do you get business stakeholders excited in the business? Most clients haven’t had children. Tell them stories about individual mothers. “Let’s go and ask Julie” was code for we need to ask a real mom. Why is this photo of a pregnant mom showing her NOT wearing our pregnancy clothing but rather a plus sized dress?
- Get people interested doing “day in the life of”. Gives design team an idea of everything that happens during day and what products might be needed.
- Let community members post their own question.
- Members wanted team to celebrate with her, reassure her, advise her
- Replicate the role of friend and trusted advisor
Related articles
- No way? Way! The LoveStats Book! #MRX (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- The Gap between brands and consumers by Adams and Hallums #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Ethical Framework for SMR, Panel #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
Behavioural Economics by Ken Parker, #SoMeMR #Li #fb
11.45 Behavioural Economics & Online Qual – Made for each other?
- Moving behavioural economics from the theoretical to the practical
- Illustrating how the pillars of BE can be addressed by different qual research data collection techniques
- Highlighting the benefits of online qual research techniques to evaluate many of the BE heuristics
- Recognising the benefits of traditional qual techniques to address many of the BE biases
Ken Parker, Chairman, Discovery
- 50% of US qual as an online component
- Tor Norretranders – we process 16 of 11 millions bits of information our senses pass to our brain. The conscious part receives much less info than the unconscious part.
- John Wanamaker – half the money i spend on advertising is wasted but i don’t know which half
- AIDA – awareness, interest, desire, action
- Now – behavioural economics, Read “Predictably Irrational“
- We do not consciously consider all the the possible options. We only consider from those perceived to be available. But people think they have the full choice.
- Antonio Damasio – “I have emotions, therefore I am rational”
- Rory Sutherland – MR asks the wrong questions and money is spend investigating hair splitting distinctions that have little relation to context in which people actually make choices
- Behavioural economics – Behaviour is King. Forget intentions, attitudes and focus on what people actually do. [The best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour]
- Pillars of BE are Heuristics and Biases. Heuristics are shortcuts you use, rules of thumb, educated guesses, common sense, it’s rare that we buy the best product. We buy something that’s good enough, that does the job, but this one is pretty good. Biases are usually based on unfair negatives. (All turnips are gross.)
- We can answer who, how, where, what when, but we can’t really answer why. We can make up answers but they may not be the right answer. We are poor witnesses of our own behaviour. We are excellent witness of our emotions though.
Qual gives us the here and now. Don’t like how it relies on recall though. [what is chivvying?] - Heuristics good for online qual. Biases good for traditional qual.
- Watch for authority bias, effort bias, fairness bias, anchoring, social proof, badwagon, herding, framing, brand heuristic (Campbell’s means quality as opposed to beans). [These heuristics and biases aren’t limited to HE. These are generic human behaviour.]
Related articles
- Dan Ariely on Behavioural Economics (3quarksdaily.com)
- Behavioural Economics by Ken Parker, #SoMeMR #Li #fb (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li
11.15 Brand together: The social media experience from the consumer perspective
- Examining the key findings from Promise’s private community of social media research and co-creation participants.
- How participants have found the experience
- What could be improved to get more of respondents’ time, commitment and dedication
- How social media research has compared to other research tools they have participated in
- What their ideal engagement with researchers would be like
Doron Meyassed, Director & Founder, Promise Communities
Felix Koch, Consultancy Director, Promise Communities
- 5 things about co-creation we didn’t know before we created our community
- What do consumers love and hate about online co-creation; Why do they take part; What would they change
- 230 people, 14000 contributions, 11 comments every hour, 150 characters per comment, 8 pound incentive voucher at Amazon; Participants were top contributors from other communities and so not rep of average community. Opinions from people who actually move opinions and create new products.
- First thing – interacting with brand is more important than interacting with peers. We are often told to make brand behind the scenes and this seems wrong for co-creation. They want to share with the brand, THEN meet other like-minded people, THEN get rewards. Unless confidentially is a huge issue, don’t run unbranded communities. It will introduce bias but it gets the most out of the community.
- Second – sharing back the impact they had on the company is the single biggest driver of Sustained Participation. Strong impact on decisions is top reason, THEN rewards, THEN social status and peer recognition. Feedback correlates highly with participation. Therefore tell people what the brand is doing or not doing to keep people motivated. Show a picture of the research team working with a messy conference room.
- Third – communities make people more creative and able to express themselves. Why? Platform to express themselves simply (millions of images, videos, text available to use online). Longitudinal method allows them to develop skills and confidence over time. Feel safe and not judged. The ‘bar’ for results has been lowered – what is classified as creative isn’t so hard to reach. Create WITH consumers not FOR consumers.
- Fourth – Every community has two entities. Members become slightly biased over time but it’s marginal. In their example, 22% of members feel close to the brand before the community, a number that doubled after joining the community. Cherish fans and acknowledge them, they are totally biased, use for co-creaton. Larger community is less engaged, refresh them and use for refinement and evaluation. Don’t throw out the biased fans.
- Fifth – Participants can develop 8 new propositions in 8 weeks. Good quality in short time frame. Turn responders into researcchers. Give respondent tools to do research, cameras. Create collaborative units that compete over time.
- Sixth – they hate the term co-creation. don’t call it insight or cocreation. Don’t be swanky with the wording.
Related articles
- No way? Way! The LoveStats Book! #MRX (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Community Approach by Bester and Dunn, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- The Gap between brands and consumers by Adams and Hallums #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Brand Together by Meyassed and Koch, #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Will Communities Kill the 6 Group Project by Nick Priestley #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mumsnet Engagement #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Mum knows best by Child and Boreham, #SoMeMR #li #mrx (lovestats.wordpress.com)
- Ethical Framework for SMR, Panel #SoMeMR #MRX #li (lovestats.wordpress.com)