Tag Archives: ARF

Check Out the Statistical Outlier on my LinkedIn Cluster Analysis

Well, isn’t that a boring way to say look at this cool visualization on LinkedIn! It’s particularly neat if your LinkedIn folks come from a few different places. Perhaps you’ve linked in with folks from your last 3 jobs, plus some friends, and some family. This fun little program will run a fancy schmancy cluster analysis and figure out all the groupings for you. You will have to name them yourself but some of them will be really obvious. You can try yours here: InMaps.

And you can see my InMap right here!

Related Articles


The Future of Social Media Research – ScribeMedia.org

[tweetmeme source=”lovestats” only_single=false]Also out today, the video interview I did while at the ARF Audience Measurement conference in New York. These are my thoughts to a number of question on social media research. Do leave your comments below!

The Future of Social Media Research – ScribeMedia.org.

ARF AM5 Day 2: Bees, not buzz but busy!

Coconut macaroons, a type of popular meringue-...

Image via Wikipedia

[tweetmeme source=”lovestats” only_single=false]We started bright and early at 8am again. Today, I claimed my seat in the “reserved for speakers” row right in front. Ok, so maybe I wasn’t speaking on those specific panels but people are scared to take the front row and I like it. How else are you to see peoples faces without squinting and take good videos!

The first few sessions reflected a normal curve with a yeller and a reader on the outlying points with most speakers taking a more moderate approach. My fave talk of the morning was a discussion of whether the ipad is a revolution or an evolution. I’m not sure where I stand as I don’t buy magazines to begin with and certainly wouldn’t spend hundreds of dollars to then spend a few more bucks on a magazine. But then I’m just cheap. I mean frugal. Yeah, that’s it.

Then, I was off to record a 15 minute video summary of my presentation. Somehow, it turned into an hour and a half discussion as the video team and Steve Rappaport had a unique interest in my topic. It does always seem to intrigue people when I explain how social media data can be properly analyzed and turned into research. And then, Joel Rubinson arrived and I got to admire two great minds at work!

Lunch was very nice and surprise surprise, there were macaroons for dessert! Not the coconut macaroons we are used to, but the meringue style you find all over Paris. Needless to say, after I left the table, there were no more left. 🙂

Then came my session. Between myself, Stacey Hall, Heather Milt, and Sean Case of Peanut Labs, we presented a session on using social media research to evaluate television viewing. Stacey started the show by describing just how massive the volume of social media data is. Then, I followed with a discussion of the research itself. And, given that USA had just won a world cup game, it only seemed fitting to begin and end the presentation with a blast from my blackberry vuvuzela app! (On that note, if you are annoyed by the sound of the app, make sure it isn’t your own making the noise when you wander into a quiet restaurant!)

The best compliment received after the presentation came from an elderly gentleman. You could stereotype and say “what does he care, he remembers the 1930 census.” Well, age is no measure of social media research appreciation. He watched the presentation and announced to us he was a convert. 🙂

The day ended with several more panel discussions slotted quickly after each other. Again, there was barely time to breathe before more neat ideas were rammed 2 by 2 into my head. I’m going to have to read my tweets as a refresher.

Finally, the most fun of the day was taping live commentary from the ARF team. There were some refusals but they quickly turned into videos. How could they say no when I won the flip video from them! Watch this space for that video!

As a newbie to this conference, it was definitely an eye opener for me. I heard a lot of new ideas that will float around my brain while I figure out how to apply them to my work. I also heard lots of familiar buzz words, met lots of new people, and listened to lots of tweeple. Now I can’t wait for the next conference. Maybe it will have 20 minute breaks?


Read these too

  • Radical Stats
  • Ode to a Boxplot
  • Survey Design Tip #2: Short and Sweet
  • Survey Design Tip #1: Responders DON’T CARE
  • Privacy – Do you really think about it?
  • ARF AM5 Day 1: Bacon! No, not that bacon.

    Kevin Bacon.

    Image via Wikipedia

    Welcome to New York!

    As a blogger, I ought to begin with full disclosure (so I learned today). This was the first ARF conference I’ve attended so my remarks reflect the opinions of a newbie.

    Compared to the last few conferences I’ve attended, this one had the most jam-packed session schedule (8am start to 6pm finish), and the shortest break times (15 min). Phew! We barely had time to breathe before the next session started! There was almost no time for networking if you wanted to catch every single session.

    The day started with what could potentially be the most boring talk ever – the US census. But it wasn’t. A few cute stories, including one about a lady dressing in her sunday best and waiting for the enumerator to arrive in 1930, and other interesting research details made it a great keynote. As researchers, we found it quite humorous that their goal is a 100% response rate when we struggle to achieve rates in the teens. And numerous speakers afterwards were eager to reference it in their talks.

    Since I’ve never been to an ARF conference, I’m not sure what is new or different. But, compared to other conferences, I’ve already learned far more at this one. I probably have less experience in advertising than most attendees so that was probably a big factor. It was great to hear new factoids and new theories instead of rehashing ones I’ve heard five times before.

    I also noticed a greater tendency to discuss stats and research not just ideas. There was constant talk of regression models, significance tests, test control methods, and confidence intervals, words which rarely come up at other conferences. It certainly met with my approval and I hope to see tons more of it at MRA and MRIA! That is, not including the session which seemed to masquerade regression as a new fangled branded proprietary tool. It just felt like taking advantage of people who might not realize it’s just regression.

    Lunch, of course, must be discussed. Lovely salad with a choice of hot dishes and a choice of cakes. Cheesecake and carrot cake since you ask. Attendees had the choice of sitting at a company sponsored table where they could talk business with that company, or a regular table where you could talk anything with anyone. I tried both. I started with a social media table for the main course and then drifted to a regular table for desert. The topic table was an interesting idea. Everyone was ready to hear about the same idea. But it only works if your table moderator stays at the table. Oops!

    I made great use of the flip camera I won from the ARF. Stay tuned for the video on how BP is six degrees from Kevin Bacon! Mmmm bacon.

    Day 1 score? A!

    Read these too

  • Survey Panel Questions – Enough Already! Word Cloud of my Resume – Wicked Cool!
  • Survey Design Tip #4: Brands are people too
  • Oh oh, I Have Another Favourite Statistic!
  • TV Shows From When I Was Short
  • Radical Stats
  • I won a Flip Ultra from the ARF! Thank you ARF, Google, and Wikipedia!

    [tweetmeme source=”lovestats” only_single=false]

    In anticipation of the ARF Audience Measurement conference in New York, the ARF gave attendees three chances to win this pretty little video camera, a Flip Ultra.

    How did I win? I just so happened to be the first person to answer this question correctly:

    In the 1940’s NBC owned the Red Network and the Blue Network among others. What entity did the Blue Network eventually become?

    Heck if I know the answer to that but thank you Google! I just entered the question word for word into Google and it brought me to wikipedia.
    The Blue Network was the on-air name of an American radio production and distribution service from 1942 to 1945, which traced its formal origins back to 1927. It was born of a divestiture, arising from anti-trust litigation, of one of the two radio networks owned by the National Broadcasting Company, and is the direct predecessor of the American Broadcasting Company.

    Thank you ARF! I can’t wait to post video of the conference!

    Read these too

    5.367 tips for presenting charts people will like

    Jordens inre

    Image via Wikipedia

    Having just attended and presented at several conferences, and with one more on the list, I’ve seen more than my fair share of powerpoint presentations in the last few weeks. Some had some great slides, and, well, others I can’t say anything about because I couldn’t read them.

    As a presenter, I know you have a ton of things to worry about. Is your topic interesting? Are YOU interesting? Can you fill up so much time and not flub it all up? It seems we leave building a readable presentation to the end of the list and then we never actually finish the list.

    With that in mind, here are just a few tips that will result in your audience being more appreciative of your presentation. And they’re quick so try them out!

    1. If one line or bar represents the “right” number, colour it green. And vice versa, if one line or bar represents the “wrong” number, colour it red. People are primed to interpret green as go and red as stop so help them understand your data more easily.
    2. If you’re using a line chart, make the lines really thick, thick as in 5 to 10 points. There will be people at the back of the room because there are no seats at the front (yay!). Help them like your presentation by allowing them to see the data too.
    3. Increase the font sizes to crazy big numbers everywhere. Do you need a vertical scale? Increase that font! Need a horizontal scale? Increase that font! Make it so big and fat that it looks wrong – because it will look right from the back of the room. Font sizes should be at least 20 points but go with 30 or more if you can make it work.
    4. Make the chart as big as you possibly can. Take extraneous words off the page to give more room to the chart. If the words aren’t on the page, it will give you something to say instead of read. And people will be grateful for it.
    5. For the love of God, don’t make your chart 3D! Sure, it may be pretty but 3D in presentation style is ten times worse than 3D in paper style. There’s no way your audience can pull your slide close to their face to more accurately interpret all the extra chart junk that 3D creates. Simple is good. Simple is readable.

    5.367. Do not default to the default chart. Default charts are there for people who shouldn’t be using charts in the first place. You are smarter than your software so think about your audience, your purpose, the room where you’ll be presenting and create a custom chart that will work for that specific situation.

    Why 5.367? Because people are more likely to believe numbers that use decimal places. Do you believe that?

    Read these too

    Esomar Chicago Day 2: Four days later!

    Chicago Harbor Lighthouse

    Image via Wikipedia

    Day 2 brought lots of interesting topics as well. We started off with updates on the ESOMAR 26 document, the ARF quality initiative, and the ISO process. I did not know that the first ESOMAR code was developed in 1948! I did not know that people from 26 countries were involved in the ISO process. It was not a surprise, however, to hear the findings of the ARF quality study .

    • data quality is not the serious issue that was previously thought
    • panel duplication is really only about 16%
    • heavy responders provide good data
    • response rates are not the best indicators of quality data.

    After the ARF presentation indicating a complete lack of ability to identify a weighting system that would equalize panels, one unlucky speaker had the unfortunate time slot of presenting his work on how the CART system can indeed weight data sources to be equal. Personally, I’m still on the side that panels cannot be weighted to be equal. I’ve participated in so many parallel studies for so many different types of surveys and categories of products  and have yet to seen a perfectly successful case. Sure, you can always weight a few variables into comparability, but you lose out on a bunch more. Maybe CART is the magic solution. Time will tell.

    Once again, survey panels took the hit on not being representative of the general population. Really, come on folks, what method of marketing research IS representative of the general population. None. End of story. In the end, the only kind of representativity that matters is making sure your sample suits the purpose. And, if your results never predict the marketplace, get out of the business.

    Kim Dedeker was kind enough to share a few thoughts on the state of the industry since she first caused a good storm. Her advice – the industry can only be sustained through quality, we need to continue having and creating leadership through getting involved.

    The last major topic of the day was mobile research. I must confess that I am STILL not a believer. I just don’t see how the ability to answer a 20 minute survey on a 2 inch screen as you ride the bus or pay for your new purchase is going to bring the survey industry back from the deadly response rate dive.

    Feel free to also read a few other thoughts I had about ESOMAR Chicago in a piece I wrote for research-live.

    Below is Kim speaking and a presentation about social media that mentioned the tweet-up at Lux Bar.

    Kim dedeker speaks at esomar chicago #cet gets mentioned

    Related Posts


  • Esomar Chicago: Day 1
  • Tagxedo for colorful shapeable saveable word clouds
  • Kama Sutra Statistics
  • What’s Your IQ?
  • It’s your turn to discover the nuances of social media research
  • 2009 ARF Great Mind Awards


    Congratulations to some friends at Ipsos!

    The ARF congratulates the esteemed recipients of the ARF 2009 Great Mind Awards! The Awards were presented on Wednesday, April 1 at a special luncheon during Re:think 2009: The ARF Annual Convention + Expo. Sponsored by Harris Interactive, The ARF Great Mind Awards recognize individuals who bring excellence to advertising research in the categories of research innovation, rising research stars, important member contributions to the field and lifetime contributors to the industry and ARF.


    For individuals who made an outstanding contribution to the ARF in the prior year. From above-and-beyond duty to providing pro-bono services, these are members who have made significant contributions to the success of the ARF and the industry.

    Efrain Ribeiro – Ipsos
    Renee Smith – Ipsos

    [copied from the ARF website]

    Related Articles

  • TV Shows From When I Was Short
  • Radical Stats
  • Ode to a Boxplot
  • Survey Design Tip #2: Short and Sweet
  • Survey Design Tip #1: Responders DON’T CARE
  • Privacy – Do you really think about it?
  • %d bloggers like this: