Live blogged from #ESRA15 in Reykjavik. Any errors or bad jokes are my own.
I tried to stay up until midnight last night but ended going to bed around 10:30pm. Naturally, it was still daylight outside. I woke up this morning at 6am in broad daylight again. I’m pretty sure it never gets dark here no matter what they say. I began my morning routine as usual. Banged my head on the slanted ceiling, stared out the window at the amazing church, made myself waffles in the kitchen, and then walked past the pond teaming with baby ducks. Does it get any better? I think no. Except of course knowing i had another day of great content rich sessions ahead of me!
- tested different income questions. allowed people to use a weekly, monthly, or annual income scale as they wished. there was also no example response, and no example of what constitutes income. Provided about 30 answer options to choose from, shown in three columns. Provided same result as a very specific question in some countries but not others.
- also tested every country getting the same number breaks, groups weren’t arranged to reflect each countries distribution. this resulted in some empty breaks [but that’s not necessarily a problem if the other breaks are all well and evenly used]
- when countries are asked to set up number breaks in well defined deciles, high incomes are chosen more often – affected because people had different ideas of what is and isn’t taxable income
- [apologies for incomplete notes, i couldn’t quite catch all the details, we did get a “buy the book” comment.]
item non-response and readability of survey questionnaire
- any non-substantive outcome – missing values, refusals, don’t knows all count
- non response can lower validity of survey results
- semantic complexity measured by familiarity of words, length of words, abstract words that can’t be visualized, structural complexity
- Measured – characters in an item, length of words, percent of abstract words, percent of lesser known words, percent of long words 12 or more characters
- used the european social survey which is a highly standardized international survey, compared english and estonian, it is conducted face to face, 350 questions, 2422 uk respondents
- less known and abstract words create more non-response
- long words increase nonresponse in estonian but not in english, perhaps because english words are shorter anyways
- percent of long words in english created more nonresponse
- total length of an item didn’t affect nonresponse
- [they used a list of uncommon words for measurement, such a book/list does exist in english. I used it in school to choose a list of swear words that had the same frequency levels as regular words.]
- [audience comment – some languages join many words together which means their words are longer but then there are fewer words, makes comparisons more difficult]
helping respondents provide good answers in web surveys
- some tasks are inherently difficult in surveys, often because people have to write in an answer, coding is expensive and error prone
- this study focused on prescription drugs which are difficult to spell, many variations of the same thing, level of detail is unclear, but we have full lists of all these drugs available to us
- examined breakoff rates, missing data, response times, and codability of responses
- asked people if they are taking drugs, tell us about three
- study 2 – cleaned up the list, made all the capitalization the same. break off rates were now all the same. response times lower but still higher than the textbox version. codability still better for list versions.
rating scale labelling in web surveys – are numeric labels an advantage
- you can use all words to label scales or just words on the end with numbers in between
- research says there is less satisficing with verbal scales, they are more natural than numbers and there is no inherent meaning of numbers
- means of the scales were different
- less tie to completes the end labeled groups
- people paid more attention to the five point labeled scale, and least to the end point labeled score
- mean opinions did differ by scale, more positive on fully labeled scale
- high cognitive burden to map responses of the numeric scales
- lower reliability for the numeric labels